Verified: Checked on .
| Fee Category | Typical Structure | Notes |
|---|
| Spot Trading — Maker | Percentage of trade value | Maker orders add liquidity to the order book |
| Spot Trading — Taker | Percentage of trade value (often higher than maker) | Taker orders remove existing liquidity |
| Deposit — Crypto | Usually free (network fee may apply) | Network/gas fees are paid to the blockchain, not the exchange |
| Withdrawal — Crypto | Fixed or percentage per asset | Varies significantly by blockchain and congestion |
| Deposit — Fiat | Varies by payment method and region | Card deposits often carry higher fees than bank transfers |
| Withdrawal — Fiat | Varies by method and region | Processing times differ; fees may be flat or percentage-based |
| Inactivity Fee | May apply after extended dormancy | Check terms of service for specific thresholds |
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Spot-only focus reduces exposure to leveraged liquidation risks
- Simplified interface may be accessible for newer traders
- Standard order types (market, limit, stop-limit) cover most retail use cases
- Mobile app extends platform accessibility
- KYC compliance aligns with regulatory expectations in many regions
Cons
- Custodial model means users do not control private keys during trading
- Liquidity depth for smaller altcoin pairs may be limited
- Fee transparency requires careful review of the official schedule
- Regulatory status and fiat availability vary significantly by country
- Proof-of-reserves and security audit history may not be publicly available
- No derivatives or advanced trading products for experienced traders seeking those features
Last updated: 2026-02-24T21:07:38.223Z